In combine mode, the new frame just overlays the previous one, which remains visible where the new frame is transparent. In replace mode, each frame completely replace the previous one (which is removed), there are no pixels left visible from the previous frame.
#Gimp gif weird frams how to
I still don't know what replace mode is, or how to use it, or if making the frames opaque will cause problems with how the image looks. Ok, that sounds like I can't de-optimize my final image, bummer. The change will be applied to all of the layers and not just the active layer. From there you can manually input what you’d like the size of the image to be in terms of numeric value. To resize your GIF, simply go to Image -> Scale Image. Here is a random frame over a green background: Scaling down your GIF would be a great way to reduce GIF file size with GIMP.
#Gimp gif weird frams full
(02-27-2018, 08:16 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: (02-27-2018, 07:50 AM)HavingTooMuchFun Wrote: (02-27-2018, 07:10 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: Your frames are in (combine) mode (due to some GIF optimization) and are really full of small holes through which the previous frame shows. But given the noise in your frames, this isn't useful. 4.6K 165K views 2 years ago GIMP Tutorials One of the lesser known features of GIMP is its ability to create animations. (combine) is an optimization, only useful if you have large parts of your image that are identical between two frames. The basic GIF is made of all opaque frames in (replace) mode. But when I deleted several layers of the sample GIF and spare only 5 lowest layers, the Unoptimized Filter works flawlessly. Using your sample GIF, I have the same problem like you've described. If you deoptimize the final image you'll ave yellow pixels all over. It could be the GIMP's Unoptimized Filter bug, or the number of GIF's frames is higher than the Unoptimized Filter able to handle. What is replace mode? (Sorry, my learning curve is very steep here.) If it’s possible to make the layers opaque and still have the final GIF look right… Can I de-optimize my finished image, or do I have to go back to the beginning, de-optimize the original GIF, and redo 15 frames of hand-drawing?
Will the frames being opaque cause a problem with the stuff that is SUPPOSED to show through from the background layer? If you edit an optimized GIF, you should un-optimize it first ( Filters>Animation>Unoptimize) so that all frames become completely opaque, and use (replace) mode. Here is a random frame over a green background: (02-27-2018, 07:50 AM)HavingTooMuchFun Wrote: (02-27-2018, 07:10 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: Your frames are in (combine) mode (due to some GIF optimization) and are really full of small holes through which the previous frame shows.
0 kommentar(er)
